http://www.sbbfc.co.uk/cutsrejectsappeals
The BBFC classify our films and decide who's best suited to watch them. And this is how they do it:
The Examiner’s daily programme consists of a combination of film and video/DVD. Due to the recent high increase in video games submissions, there are also Examiners who specialise in video games, as classifying an interactive game can be a very different experience to classifying a film or video.
Examiners normally view video and DVD submissions on their own – called solo viewing.A large proportion of works suitable are for solo viewing are episodes from TV series or works aimed at young children that have already been broadcast on television. Films for cinema release, video games and pornography submissions are classified in teams of two. Controversial works, such as extreme reality material, will also be programmed for team work.
Video games are also viewed and played, using the appropriate consoles. Games are measured by the IT department who assess how long Examiners will need to play the game and view all video elements. Games companies are asked to provide level skips, cheat codes and other information such as scripts to help Examiners make a clear assessment of a game's content.
Many films and videos are submitted in foreign languages (notably Hindi and Cantonese) and Examiners with linguistic skills are programmed to view these works. Where the work is in a language not spoken by any of the Examiners and there are no subtitles, the Board will use an interpreter, who will sit alongside the Examiner or team.
With each work, Examiners log details of what they watch, including:
• general context - plot, characters, outline of individual scenes
• timings of classification moments, including camera angles, type of shots, on- and off-screen moments
• bad language, sex and drug references and so on
Reports include a brief synopsis of the work, details of the classification issues and an argument in support of the category. Most decisions are straightforward and are based on the Board's published Guidelines, which were last revised in 2009. The distributor can request a specific category, which the solo Examiner or team will take into consideration, but such a request does not determine a decision. If necessary and appropriate, cuts may be suggested to meet the category request, and the decision will be ultimately made by the distributor.
A work is referred for further viewing by a team if an Examiner is unsure about an issue or theme.Sometimes a work will fall between two categories. This second team could include a Senior Examiner or an Examiner with expertise in the particular subject, as well as the Director and the Head of Policy.Difficult or controversial material can also be referred to the weekly Examiners’ Meeting, where they can be debated further to obtain a wide range of valuable opinions. Ultimately, the work will be referred to Senior Management.
If a work contains material which is illegal or unacceptable under the Board's Guidelines, Examiners will draw up a list of cuts which will be sent to the distributor. If a work as a whole is unacceptable, it can be rejected, but this happens only on rare occasions. The Presidential Team will be consulted on difficult works, especially those which may be refused a certificate altogether or which raise serious policy issues.The BBFC try to minimise the need for cuts, but works will have to be cut if they where a work contravenes relevant legislation or particular Board policies. Sometimes, the distributor makes a decision to cut to recieve a lower rating to gain a wider audience and these are called 'cuts for category'.If a central concept of the work is unacceptable (for example, a sex work with a rape theme); or if intervention in the form of cuts or other means is not acceptable to the submitting company; or if the changes required would be extensive or complex; the work may be rejected, ie refused a classification at any category. Since cinema licences permit the option of a local certificate, film companies are free to submit their product to any local authority in the hope of a different outcome. A letter of rejection will be sent to the submitting company detailing reasons for the rejection.
The BBFC offers a formal ‘reconsideration’ procedure which is open to any distributor dissatisfied with the determination made in respect of their work. The reconsideration is free of charge and will normally take less than 10 working days. A distributor may also appeal directly to an independent authority. Such an appeal may take place following, or instead of, a request for reconsideration by the BBFC. In the case of films, the distributor (or any member of the public) may address itself to the local authority which licenses cinemas in a particular area. In the case of video works (including DVDs, video games, etc) a distributor may appeal to the Video Appeals Committee (VAC) which is independent of the BBFC. The most recent rulings were over The Last House on the Left (1972) in 2002 and the video game, Manhunt 2 in 2007.